Human cell surface-AAV interactomes identify LRP6 as blood-brain barrier transcytosis receptor and immune cytokine IL3 as AAV9 binder

Adeno-associated viruses (AAVs) are foundational gene delivery tools for basic science and clinical therapeutics. However, lack of mechanistic insight, especially for engineered vectors created by directed evolution, can hamper their application. Here, we adapt an unbiased human cell microarray platform to determine the extracellular and cell surface interactomes of natural and engineered AAVs. We identify a naturally-evolved and serotype-specific interaction between the AAV9 capsid and human interleukin 3 (IL3), with possible roles in host immune modulation, as well as lab-evolved low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein 6 (LRP6) interactions specific to engineered capsids with enhanced blood-brain barrier crossing in non-human primates after intravenous administration. The unbiased cell microarray screening approach also allows us to identify off-target tissue binding interactions of engineered brain-enriched AAV capsids that may inform vectors’ peripheral organ tropism and side effects. Our cryo-electron tomography and AlphaFold modeling of capsid-interactor complexes reveal LRP6 and IL3 binding sites. These results allow confident application of engineered AAVs in diverse organisms and unlock future target-informed engineering of improved viral and non-viral vectors for non-invasive therapeutic delivery to the brain.

For all statistical analyses, confirm that the following items are present in in the figure legend, table legend, main text, or or Methods section.

n/a Confirmed
The exact sample size (n) for each experimental group/condition, given as as a discrete number and unit of of measurement A statement on on whether measurements were taken from distinct samples or or whether the same sample was measured repeatedly The statistical test(s) used AND whether they are one-or or two-sided Only common tests should be described solely by name; describe more complex techniques in the Methods section.

A description of of all covariates tested
A description of of any assumptions or or corrections, such as as tests of of normality and adjustment for multiple comparisons A full description of of the statistical parameters including central tendency (e.g.means) or or other basic estimates (e.g.regression coefficient) AND variation (e.g. standard deviation) or or associated estimates of of uncertainty (e.g.confidence intervals) For null hypothesis testing, the test statistic (e.g.F, t, r) with confidence intervals, effect sizes, degrees of of freedom and P value noted Give P values as exact values whenever suitable.
For Bayesian analysis, information on on the choice of of priors and Markov chain Monte Carlo settings For hierarchical and complex designs, identification of of the appropriate level for tests and full reporting of of outcomes Estimates of of effect sizes (e.g.Cohen's d, Pearson's r), ), indicating how they were calculated Our web collection on statistics for biologists contains articles on many of the points above.

Software and code
Policy information about availability of of computer code Data collection

Data analysis
For manuscripts utilizing custom algorithms or or software that are central to to the research but not yet described in published literature, software must be be made available to to editors and reviewers.We We strongly encourage code deposition in in a community repository (e.g.GitHub).See the Nature Portfolio guidelines for submitting code & software for further information.
-Accession codes, unique identifiers, or web links for publicly available datasets -A description of any restrictions on data availability -For clinical datasets or third party data, please ensure that the statement adheres to our policy

Human research participants
Policy information about studies involving human research participants and Sex and Gender in Research.

Ethics oversight
Note that full information on the approval of the study protocol must also be provided in the manuscript.

Field-specific reporting
Please select the one below that is the best fit for your research.If you are not sure, read the appropriate sections before making your selection.

Life sciences
Behavioural & social sciences Ecological, evolutionary & environmental sciences For a reference copy of the document with all sections, see nature.com/documents/nr-reporting-summary-flat.pdf

Life sciences study design
All studies must disclose on these points even when the disclosure is negative.No data were excluded from the analysis.
Each in vitro experiment were evaluated in multiple repeats.Details are provided in relevant figure legends and methods sections.Animal experiments used three animals.All attempts at replication were successful.
Samples or animals were randomly allocated into experimental group.For imaging and quantification we randomly selected the fields-ofviews in the specific regions of the brain.
The investigators were not blinded to allocation during group allocation, data collection, or analysis as the differences between control and experimental groups were too obvious and, thus, blinding would not have been practicable.
Use the terms sex (biological attribute) and gender (shaped by social and cultural circumstances) carefully in order to avoid confusing both terms.Indicate if findings apply to only one sex or gender; describe whether sex and gender were considered in study design whether sex and/or gender was determined based on self-reporting or assigned and methods used.Provide in the source data disaggregated sex and gender data where this information has been collected, and consent has been obtained for sharing of individual-level data; provide overall numbers in this Reporting Summary.Please state if this information has not been collected.Report sex-and gender-based analyses where performed, justify reasons for lack of sex-and gender-based analysis.Describe the covariate-relevant population characteristics of the human research participants (e.g.age, genotypic information, past and current diagnosis and treatment categories).If you filled out the behavioural & social sciences study design questions and have nothing to add here, write "See above."Describe how participants were recruited.Outline any potential self-selection bias or other biases that may be present and how these are likely to impact results.No sample size calculation was performed.A sample size of 3 mice or at least 3 biological replicates were chosen for in vivo and in vivo validation experiments.Precise numbers are given in the relevant figure legends and methods sections.Sample sizes were set based on prior experience (Kumar et al Nature Methods 2020, Shay Sullivan Ding et al Sci Adv 2023).
Identify the organization(s) that approved the study protocol.